Advertisements
Home News Court Affirms Trespassing Charges Against January 6 Defendants

Court Affirms Trespassing Charges Against January 6 Defendants

by Celia
Court Affirms Trespassing Charges Against January 6 Defendants

A pivotal ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has upheld the criminal trespassing charges against nearly all of the 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This decision, delivered on Tuesday, reinforces the legal framework under which prosecutors can pursue these cases and rejects attempts to limit the charges available to them.

Advertisements

In a closely watched 2-1 decision, the panel dismissed an appeal from defendant Couy Griffin, who sought to overturn his misdemeanor conviction for unlawfully entering a restricted area protected by the U.S. Secret Service. Griffin contended that federal prosecutors should have been required to demonstrate that he was aware of then-Vice President Mike Pence’s presence at the Capitol that day, as Pence was overseeing the certification of the 2020 election results.

Advertisements

However, the court clarified that prosecutors need only establish that a defendant knowingly entered a restricted area. Judge Cornelia Pillard, writing for the majority, stated, “We have no basis to conclude that Congress intended to undermine its vital aim by requiring proof that an intruder knew, when he breached a federally restricted area, that a Secret Service protectee was or would be present.”

Advertisements

This ruling is significant as approximately 95% of Capitol riot defendants are facing similar trespassing charges, according to figures from the U.S. Justice Department as of August. A contrary ruling could have complicated numerous ongoing prosecutions related to the January 6 events.

The legal landscape has been further complicated by a recent Supreme Court decision in June that raised the bar for prosecutors pursuing felony obstruction charges against those involved in the riot. This has forced a reassessment of over 250 cases.

As this legal saga continues to unfold, both the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington and Griffin’s attorney have yet to comment on this latest development.

Read more:

Panel Recommends No Change To Courtroom Camera Ban Despite Push For Transparency

UK Law Firm Partners Now Charging Over £1,000 Per Hour Amid Competitive Pressures

225 NGOs Demand EU Reject Delay On Historic Deforestation Law

Advertisements

You may also like

logo

Bilkuj is a comprehensive legal portal. The main columns include legal knowledge, legal news, laws and regulations, legal special topics and other columns.

「Contact us: [email protected]

© 2023 Copyright bilkuj.com