Ben & Jerry’s has filed a lawsuit against its parent company, Unilever, alleging that it has been silenced in its attempts to advocate for Palestinian rights and support humanitarian efforts in Gaza. The ice cream brand claims that Unilever has breached a previous settlement agreement by preventing it from publicly expressing its stance on critical social issues, including calls for a ceasefire in Gaza and support for Palestinian refugees.
The legal action, filed in federal court on Wednesday, marks a significant escalation in the ongoing tensions between Ben & Jerry’s and Unilever. This conflict traces back to 2021 when Ben & Jerry’s announced it would stop selling its products in Israeli-occupied territories, asserting that such sales were inconsistent with the company’s values. This decision sparked backlash from investors and led Unilever to sell its Israeli business interests to a local licensee, allowing sales to continue in both Israel and the West Bank.
According to the lawsuit, Ben & Jerry’s attempted to speak out on four separate occasions regarding peace and human rights issues but faced suppression from Unilever each time. The suit claims that Unilever threatened to dismantle Ben & Jerry’s independent board and pursue legal action against its members if they continued their advocacy efforts. Specifically, the ice cream maker alleges that Unilever’s head of ice cream expressed concerns about potential perceptions of anti-Semitism arising from their public statements.
The lawsuit also highlights a financial dispute regarding a $5 million payment from a previous settlement that was intended for donations to human rights organizations. Ben & Jerry’s selected groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace and the Council on American-Islamic Relations, but Unilever objected, claiming that these organizations were “too critical” of the Israeli government.
In response to the allegations, Unilever issued a statement expressing sympathy for all victims of the conflict in the Middle East while firmly rejecting Ben & Jerry’s claims. The company stated, “We will defend our case very strongly” and declined further comment on the ongoing litigation.
This latest lawsuit underscores the complex relationship between corporate governance and social activism in today’s business landscape. Since its founding in 1978 by Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, Ben & Jerry’s has built a reputation as a socially responsible brand committed to progressive causes. However, after being acquired by Unilever in 2000, tensions have arisen over how closely the parent company aligns with those values.
As Unilever prepares to spin off its ice cream division by 2025, this legal dispute could complicate the transition. Experts suggest that the independent board of Ben & Jerry’s may pose challenges for Unilever as it navigates this corporate restructuring while maintaining compliance with its commitments to social responsibility.
The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications not only for Ben & Jerry’s future operations but also for how corporations balance profit motives with ethical considerations in an increasingly polarized world.
Read more: