Swan Bitcoin, a leading Bitcoin-focused financial services firm, has filed a legal malpractice lawsuit against Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, the prominent law firm representing it in a trade secrets case. The lawsuit, filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, alleges that the firm improperly sought to drop Swan as a client in a critical legal battle involving former employees who allegedly misappropriated proprietary information to form a competing company backed by rival cryptocurrency giant, Tether.
The dispute centers on Gibson Dunn’s decision to seek withdrawal from a federal trade secrets lawsuit that Swan filed against Proton Management, a Tether-backed entity, and several of its former employees. Swan alleges that these employees misappropriated confidential documents and attempted to undermine Swan’s position in a joint venture with Tether. Despite the firm’s involvement in the case, Gibson Dunn filed a motion on Sunday requesting permission to withdraw from the case, citing a “complete breakdown” in its relationship with Swan.
In its court filing, Gibson Dunn claimed that Swan had refused to pay outstanding legal fees, and as a result, Swan demanded $18 million to allow the firm to withdraw without opposition. “Gibson Dunn cannot continue to represent Swan under these conditions,” the firm stated in its motion to U.S. District Judge Michelle Williams Court.
In response, Swan filed for a temporary restraining order (TRO) on Monday to prevent Gibson Dunn from withdrawing from the lawsuit. Swan’s legal team argued that the firm’s actions have been highly inappropriate and have jeopardized the ongoing litigation. “As stated in our complaint, we believe Swan’s treatment here has been highly inappropriate,” said Dave Wollmuth, one of Swan’s attorneys, in a statement.
The stakes are high in this case, as the trade secrets lawsuit alleges that Proton Management and its employees misappropriated thousands of documents containing Swan’s proprietary Bitcoin-related information. The firm is also accusing the defendants of attempting to force Swan out of a joint venture with Tether, although Tether itself is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit.
The tension between Swan and Gibson Dunn escalated further when it was revealed that the law firm had hired an attorney who also represents Tether, creating a potential conflict of interest. This revelation has sparked additional concerns for Swan, which is now questioning whether its representation by Gibson Dunn has been compromised. Tether, known for issuing the widely-used dollar-pegged cryptocurrency USDT, has grown rapidly in recent years, and its increasing prominence in the crypto industry may have played a role in the underlying tensions between the firms.
Gibson Dunn has yet to respond to requests for comment regarding the ongoing litigation or the conflict of interest allegations. Spokespeople for the law firm and Tether have not provided statements at this time.
This case is not just about Swan Bitcoin and Gibson Dunn—it’s also indicative of the complex legal challenges facing the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency industry. The lawsuit highlights the increasing role of legal disputes in the world of digital finance, particularly as companies like Tether and Bitcoin-related firms are drawn into high-stakes litigation over intellectual property, trade secrets, and business rivalries.
As Swan Bitcoin seeks to protect its proprietary information and preserve its legal options, this case is likely to have lasting implications for both the legal and cryptocurrency sectors. The outcome could shape the future of client representation in the cryptocurrency industry, especially as firms like Swan Bitcoin and Tether navigate the intricate intersection of law, finance, and digital assets.
Read more:
Supreme Court Weighs $1 Billion Copyright Case Involving Cox Communications
Supreme Court Declines To Review Tobacco Companies’ Challenge To Graphic Warning Labels