In a significant ruling Friday, a federal appeals court upheld the constitutionality of a landmark law that mandates TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, either sell the social media platform or face a U.S. ban. The decision, made by a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, ensures the law—signed by President Joe Biden in April—remains in effect.
This ruling comes in the wake of growing national security concerns, with U.S. lawmakers fearing the Chinese government could access user data collected by TikTok. The law requires ByteDance to cease its operations in the U.S., citing risks of data exploitation by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), who could use it to track American citizens.
TikTok, along with ByteDance and several U.S. users, had filed a lawsuit arguing that the law infringes upon First Amendment rights. The plaintiffs contended that forcing TikTok off U.S. platforms would limit free speech. However, the court rejected these arguments, emphasizing that the U.S. government’s actions were not aimed at restricting speech but were necessary to protect national security.
“The First Amendment exists to protect free speech in the United States,” stated Senior Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg, who authored the court’s opinion. “Here, the government acted solely to protect that freedom from a foreign adversary nation and to limit that adversary’s ability to gather data on people in the United States.”
The court’s decision came from a panel composed of two judges appointed by Republican presidents—Judge Ginsburg, nominated by Ronald Reagan, and Judge Neomi Rao, nominated by Donald Trump. Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, appointed by Barack Obama, concurred with the ruling.
Despite the ruling, TikTok retains the option to appeal the decision to the full D.C. Circuit or directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The law is set to take effect on January 19, a day before President Donald Trump’s return to office, a staunch critic of TikTok and its potential risks to U.S. security.
For TikTok, the next steps are critical. The app’s legal team, led by prominent free speech advocates, has indicated the likelihood of seeking an emergency temporary stay from the U.S. Supreme Court. Jacob Huebert, representing a plaintiff in the case, stated, “Given the urgency of the situation, we will continue to fight this decision to protect Americans’ free speech rights online.”
Huebert also warned that the law could set a dangerous precedent for the future regulation of other social media platforms. “It’s a threat to free speech, no matter your stance on TikTok or China,” he asserted.
On the other side of the debate, supporters of the ruling celebrated it as a victory for national security. Republican and Democratic leaders alike praised the decision.
Chairman John Moolenaar of the U.S. House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party called the ruling a victory for American citizens, claiming, “This decision ensures that TikTok will no longer be used as a tool by the Chinese Communist Party to undermine our sovereignty and threaten national security.”
Ranking Democrat Raja Krishnamoorthi echoed Moolenaar’s sentiments, emphasizing that a divestiture of TikTok from ByteDance was the only viable solution. “Every day that TikTok remains under the control of the Chinese Communist Party is a day our national security remains at risk,” Krishnamoorthi stated.
As TikTok faces a critical juncture in its U.S. operations, the coming months will be pivotal in determining whether the app can continue to serve millions of American users or if its days are numbered. With a potential Supreme Court challenge on the horizon, the fate of TikTok remains uncertain, and the eyes of the nation remain fixed on how this legal battle will unfold.
Read more:
Natura & Co Resumes Avon Business Review After U.S. Court Approves Creditors Agreement
U.S. Supreme Court Hears Landmark Case That Could Reshape Transgender Rights
Turkey Ends Investigation Into Meta’s Data Sharing Between Threads And Instagram