In a pivotal vote on Thursday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a landmark bill aimed at expanding the federal judiciary by adding 66 new judges to courts across the country. This decision, however, comes amidst strong opposition from President Joe Biden, who has indicated he will veto the measure.
The legislation, known as the JUDGES Act, would address the ongoing judicial understaffing in federal courts by adding judges to 25 district courts in 13 states, including high-demand areas such as California, Florida, and Texas. The bill proposes a gradual increase in judicial positions, with new appointments in six waves set to occur every two years through 2035. The need for these judicial positions has been underscored by the rising federal caseload, which has surged by over 30% since Congress last expanded the judiciary in 1990.
While the bill was initially championed by both parties, its trajectory has become more contentious in recent months, with the White House signaling that President Biden intends to veto the legislation if it passes. The Democratic-led Senate had approved the measure earlier this year with widespread support, but House Republicans only advanced the bill after the results of the 2024 presidential election were determined, with former President Donald Trump securing the victory.
The House vote saw a strong Republican majority, with a final count of 236-173, but only 29 Democrats voted in favor. Democratic lawmakers, including House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jerrold Nadler, have accused Republicans of delaying the bill’s consideration until they knew Trump could appoint the first wave of new judges. Nadler criticized the delay, calling it “a political maneuver” aimed at shaping the federal bench with “ultra-conservative ideologues.”
Republican lawmakers, however, insist the measure is crucial for improving access to justice in the U.S. courts. House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, defended the bill, stating that it was about “prioritizing the needs of the American people” and ensuring courts are able to deliver “fair, impartial, and timely justice.” U.S. District Judge Robert Conrad, the Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, echoed this sentiment, asserting that the bill would significantly enhance judicial efficiency and access.
While tensions over judicial appointments have been a point of political contention, there is broad agreement on the need for reform. Currently, President Biden is on track to surpass former President Trump’s record of judicial appointments, having already nominated 233 judges during his tenure. Trump’s appointments included three justices to the U.S. Supreme Court, cementing a conservative majority. With the potential for more judicial appointments to be made in the coming years, the balance of power in the federal judiciary continues to evolve, with long-lasting implications for American law and governance.
This ongoing debate over the future of the federal judiciary highlights the intersection of law, politics, and governance. As both parties prepare for the upcoming 2024 elections, the judiciary remains a central issue, one that will continue to shape the direction of U.S. legal and political landscapes for decades to come.
Read more: