The U.S. Supreme Court deliberated on Wednesday over a Texas law that mandates age verification for users accessing online pornography, raising concerns over both the protection of minors and the potential burdens placed on adults.
The case involves a challenge from the Free Speech Coalition, a trade group representing the adult entertainment industry, which argues that the law infringes on the free speech rights of adults and exposes them to risks such as identity theft and data breaches. The Texas law, aimed at limiting minors’ access to explicit content, requires pornographic websites to verify the age of users by collecting personally identifying information before granting access.
During the hearing, the justices recognized the state’s interest in restricting access to adult material for minors but questioned whether the Texas law passed constitutional muster under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. The Court also expressed concerns that the law’s implementation could unnecessarily burden adults who seek to access constitutionally protected material.
The Texas law is part of a broader wave of similar legislation across the United States, largely driven by Republican-led states, with lawmakers citing concerns over the proliferation of online pornography and its impact on children’s welfare. The law requires websites with substantial pornographic content to ensure that all users provide proof of their age—at least 18 years old—before accessing the material.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett emphasized the challenges of using content-filtering technology, noting that filtering software struggles to keep up with the myriad devices children use to access online pornography, including gaming systems, phones, and tablets. She also expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of such measures in curbing minors’ access.
The Free Speech Coalition contends that the law is part of a broader agenda to restrict adult access to legal and protected content, alleging that it intentionally makes accessing adult material more difficult and costly. Derek Shaffer, the attorney representing the coalition, argued that the law undermines free speech by placing additional hurdles on adult users.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson raised concerns about the extent to which states could burden adults with age verification procedures, questioning how far the government could go in regulating access to legal content without infringing on constitutional rights. Meanwhile, Justice Elena Kagan questioned the application of a relaxed judicial review standard, suggesting that it could have wider implications for online free speech protections.
The Supreme Court’s decision will address the balance between protecting minors and safeguarding free speech rights for adults. A ruling is expected by the end of June.
Read more: