Hong Kong authorities have unveiled new national security legislation aimed at tackling dissent and external interference, including alleged espionage by foreign intelligence agencies, officials announced on Tuesday.
The proposed legislation, titled the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, seeks to criminalize offenses such as treason, insurrection, theft of state secrets, sabotage, and external interference. Chief Executive John Lee highlighted the importance of remaining vigilant against potential threats, both domestic and foreign, during a news conference launching a public consultation process.
Despite outward calmness in society, Lee warned of lingering undercurrents of dissent and the presence of foreign agents in Hong Kong. He emphasized the need to address these challenges to safeguard national security effectively.
The proposed legislation, which has been in the making for over 20 years, follows a crackdown on dissent triggered by Beijing’s imposition of the National Security Law in 2020. Legal experts note that while the legislation contains vague concepts regarding offenses like treason and state secrets, it aligns closely with similar laws in mainland China.
Critics, including rights groups and legal experts, argue that the proposed law could further erode fundamental freedoms and human rights in Hong Kong, bringing the city’s legal system more in line with that of mainland China. Concerns have been raised about the broad definitions of offenses and their potential impact on business confidence and foreign investment in Hong Kong.
The legislation’s consultation period will run until February 28, with the government aiming to pass the law before the legislative summer recess. However, exiled pro-democracy figures, such as former lawmaker Ted Hui, have expressed concerns about potential legal ambiguities and the broad scope of the proposed law, which they fear could target individuals supporting democracy or engaging in overseas lobbying activities.
As Hong Kong grapples with ongoing political and social tensions, the introduction of this new national security legislation is likely to reignite debates over the city’s autonomy and the balance between security concerns and civil liberties.