Hong Kong officials have vehemently criticized remarks made by UK-based NGO Hong Kong Watch and several other activist groups regarding the forthcoming new security law, asserting that the legislation would have “further devastating consequences” for human rights in the city.
In response to the collective statement issued by the groups, the government stated on Tuesday night that their comments were “skewed” and accused them of making “deliberate smears.” A government spokesperson emphasized that the allegations were far from accurate.
The condemnation came after Hong Kong Watch and other organizations expressed opposition to the impending legislation of a national security law under Article 23 of Hong Kong’s mini-constitution. The joint statement, signed by groups from various countries including the US, UK, and Canada, raised concerns about the vague provisions of the proposed law and its potential impact on free expression.
According to the joint statement, the proposed law would undermine due process and fair trial rights of the people of Hong Kong. It also highlighted the broader implications of enacting Article 23 beyond the existing national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020.
The national security law, enacted following the 2019 protests, criminalized activities such as secession, subversion, terrorism, and collusion with foreign forces. Despite claims by authorities that the law restored stability, concerns remain, with independent media outlets closing and activists facing detention.
Authorities argue that further legislation under Article 23 is necessary to address “loopholes.” The proposed law covers offenses such as treason, insurrection, theft of state secrets, and external interference.
While local opposition to Article 23 has been limited due to restrictions on protests, overseas activist groups have urged countries to oppose the legislation and consider imposing sanctions on officials involved in its enactment.
In response to these calls, the Hong Kong government stated that such actions could potentially amount to the offense of foreign collusion under the national security law. Chief Executive John Lee noted positive feedback from the public during the consultation period, indicating support for enacting Article 23 to protect against potential threats.