Europe’s stance on migration is drawing criticism for undermining the rule of law across the continent. As countries tighten asylum and migration policies, they not only perpetuate human rights violations against migrants but also weaken legal and democratic safeguards that protect everyone’s rights.
The proposed United Kingdom’s Safety of Rwanda Bill exemplifies this concerning trend. The bill aims to allow the permanent deportation of asylum seekers to Rwanda, despite strong opposition. Critics argue that it would deny judicial redress to those fearing deportation to countries where they may face torture, violating the principle of equality before the law.
Moreover, the bill encroaches on judicial independence by compelling judges to align with the government’s stance on Rwanda’s safety, disregarding previous court rulings. It also grants ministers discretionary powers to overrule interim measures by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) regarding removals to Rwanda.
These issues extend beyond the UK. France’s recent deportation of an individual to Uzbekistan, despite ECtHR interim measures, underscores the erosion of legal checks and balances. Such actions signal that governments prioritize policy goals over human rights and the rule of law.
Similar trends are observed in other European countries, posing a threat to international treaties and democratic values. The disregard for ECtHR interim measures undermines the effectiveness of emergency safeguards against government overreach.
While migration policies may offer short-term political gains, they must not undermine fundamental rights and democratic principles. Protecting judicial independence and universal human rights is essential for upholding the democratic fabric of societies across Europe.