Georgia’s newly enacted law on “agents of foreign influence” is raising concerns both domestically and internationally, drawing parallels to similar measures used in Russia to stifle opposition. The legislation mandates that media outlets and non-governmental organizations receiving over 20% of their funding from abroad must register as “foreign agents” and face fines if they fail to comply.
This controversial bill, initially vetoed by Georgia’s pro-Western president, was ultimately passed by the parliament dominated by the pro-Russian ruling party. The decision has sparked widespread debate and led to protests, with around 10,000 people rallying in the capital over several days, fearing that the law could be wielded to suppress political dissent and restrict press freedom.
Similar laws enacted in Russia since 2012 have led to the designation of independent media and NGOs as “foreign agents,” forcing many to cease operations. There is apprehension that Georgia’s law might follow this trajectory, threatening human rights and freedom of expression in the country.
The European Union has expressed significant concern, criticizing the law as contrary to EU principles and urging its repeal. This development comes at a critical time for Georgia, which applied for EU membership in March 2022, shortly after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and was granted candidate status late last year. The introduction of such legislation could jeopardize Georgia’s aspirations for EU integration.
Georgia’s geopolitical landscape remains complex. Despite strong anti-Russian sentiment among its populace and a pro-Western government, the country maintains deep economic ties with Russia, especially in trade. Historical tensions persist, notably the 2008 military conflict with Russia, which resulted in Georgia losing control over parts of its territory, where Russian forces are still stationed.
Public opinion in Georgia is sharply divided. While many citizens support EU accession, there is notable resistance to certain Western liberal values, including LGBT rights. This cultural dichotomy underscores the challenges Georgia faces as it navigates its path between Western alliances and Russian influence.
The possibility of Russian involvement in the enactment of Georgia’s new law remains speculative. However, similar legislative measures are being considered in other former Soviet republics, such as Kyrgyzstan, raising alarms about Russia’s potential efforts to extend its influence and counter Western dominance in its former territories.
As Georgia moves forward, vigilance is essential to ensure that the new law is not misused to infringe on democratic freedoms and to guard against any external attempts to manipulate the country’s political landscape.