A pivotal moment is on the horizon for the real estate industry as a federal judge in Missouri prepares to weigh the merits of a groundbreaking $418 million settlement between the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and affected home buyers and sellers. With a hearing scheduled for November 26, multiple parties are urging U.S. District Judge Stephen Bough to reject this far-reaching agreement.
The proposed settlement comes in response to claims that the NAR violated antitrust laws by mandating that home sellers pay commissions to buyers’ agents to facilitate home listings. As part of the deal, NAR has committed to eliminate this controversial practice, marking a significant shift in the landscape of home buying in the United States.
Opponents of the settlement, which include various home sellers and buyers involved in separate lawsuits, argue that the deal is excessively broad and may undermine ongoing legal actions. Critics are particularly concerned about the potential repercussions for other pending claims, emphasizing that the settlement could stifle their pursuit of justice. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the plaintiffs’ attorneys’ request for substantial legal fees, which some objectors deem excessive.
In a statement, the NAR expressed its belief that the settlement fosters competition and consumer choice, asserting that it represents a positive step forward for the industry. “We will continue to advocate for final approval of this settlement,” the association stated.
Legal experts, however, are divided on the implications of the agreement. Law professor Tanya Monestier raised alarm bells, suggesting that the reforms introduced by the NAR have failed to meaningfully reduce commissions. Instead, she claims they have led to increased confusion and exploitation of consumers in the real estate market. Monestier’s objection highlights her belief that the majority of the settlement funds may ultimately benefit lawyers rather than the affected homeowners, calling into question the fairness of the financial distribution.
This settlement is not without its controversies. The initial jury verdict in October, which awarded $1.8 billion against the NAR and its affiliates, has set the stage for subsequent settlements, with brokerages responding by agreeing to resolve claims totaling over $1 billion. Notably, HomeServices of America, part of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, has also agreed to a $250 million payout as part of these legal resolutions.
As the hearing date approaches, the outcome remains uncertain. The plaintiffs’ attorneys did not respond to requests for comment before the objection deadline, but they face growing scrutiny over their fee structure and the overall impact of the settlement on affected homeowners.
The case is officially filed as Rhonda Burnett et al v. The National Association of Realtors in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri (No. 4:19-CV-00332-SRB).
Read more: