The ruling was delivered in the context of a case involving Cloud Corner, a Queens business that was padlocked in September after inspectors discovered cannabis products being sold without a license. Under powers granted in the recent state budget, local authorities were empowered to inspect and immediately close suspected illegal shops while administrative hearings were pending. However, the final authority to keep a shop closed rested solely with the sheriff’s office, even if a hearing officer recommended otherwise.
Judge Kevin Kerrigan expressed serious concerns about the fairness of this process, describing the administrative hearings as “useless” and suggesting they could potentially be a “farce.” He noted that if the sheriff’s office could disregard the findings of hearing officers, it fundamentally undermined the principle of due process, denying store owners a meaningful opportunity to defend their interests.
Mayor Adams’ spokesperson, Liz Garcia, responded to the ruling by emphasizing the city’s commitment to combating illegal shops. “Illegal smoke shops and their dangerous products endanger young New Yorkers and our quality of life,” she stated. The administration continues to assert that these closures are essential for public health and safety.
However, attorneys representing affected businesses are poised to leverage this ruling to their advantage. Lance Lazzaro, who represents Cloud Corner, predicted that the decision could allow all previously closed stores to reopen and pursue legal action for damages, including claims for lost revenue and reputational harm. “The damages will be astronomical,” he remarked, criticizing the city’s initial handling of the closure process.
The case of Cloud Corner highlights a broader issue within the city’s enforcement strategy. During an administrative hearing, the store’s owner argued that the business was closed at the time of the sheriff’s inspection, meaning no illegal sales were occurring. The hearing officer agreed but noted that the sheriff’s office chose to maintain the closure order for a full year regardless.
As the city moves forward with its appeal, this ruling raises critical questions about the balance between regulation and individual rights in the rapidly evolving cannabis market. The outcome of the appeal could have far-reaching implications for how New York City approaches illegal cannabis sales and the enforcement mechanisms employed to regulate them.
This decision not only affects the operational future of numerous shops across the city but also sets a precedent regarding due process and the legal standards governing administrative enforcement actions. Stakeholders across the industry will be closely monitoring the developments as the city seeks to navigate the complexities of cannabis regulation.
Read more: