Elon Musk, the influential CEO of companies like Tesla and SpaceX, could face the possibility of having his U.S. citizenship revoked if he misrepresented facts about his immigration status or work history, according to legal experts. Musk, born in South Africa and later moving to Canada, eventually settled in the United States and obtained citizenship. This journey, however, may hold some controversial details that are now under scrutiny.
Recent reports indicate that Musk may have worked in the U.S. without proper authorization before securing legal status. According to a report by The Washington Post, Musk worked in the United States in the 1990s while on a student visa that didn’t permit employment, later obtaining an H-1B visa. If he indeed worked before receiving a proper work visa, Musk could be accused of violating immigration law, a violation that experts say could technically justify denaturalization under U.S. immigration law.
Allegations about Musk’s immigration history have emerged against the backdrop of his public stance on immigration, which has included sharp critiques of current policies and discussions of illegal immigration. He has posted extensively about issues such as immigration and voter fraud on X (formerly Twitter), often sharing perspectives that criticize U.S. immigration policy. However, these allegations add a layer of irony, given Musk’s own immigrant roots.
Immigration Violations and Citizenship Risk
Under U.S. immigration law, specifically 8 U.S.C. § 1451, naturalized citizens can have their citizenship revoked if it was obtained by “concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.” In the case of Musk, his history in the 1990s could come into play if it is proven that he worked without authorization and later denied it on immigration forms. Such a situation could lead authorities to investigate whether he was ineligible for a green card or subsequent naturalization due to past immigration violations.
Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell University, states that if Musk’s alleged misrepresentations were significant enough to have impacted his eligibility for an H-1B visa or green card, it could technically lead to denaturalization. Yale-Loehr notes, however, that while the law allows for this, cases of citizenship revocation for historical immigration infractions are rare, as these are typically seen as minor offenses.
Controversies Surrounding Musk’s Visa History
When Musk first came to the United States, he reportedly entered on a student visa to attend Stanford University. However, reports allege that he did not enroll in classes and instead worked on a startup project, which would eventually evolve into the company Zip2. Immigration experts indicate that working on a student visa without attending school or obtaining authorization could constitute a violation. His past correspondence also indicates that he was aware of needing legal status, as he applied to Stanford due to a “lack of a legal right to stay in the country.”
The immigration forms relevant to Musk’s application process, including Forms I-485 (for green cards) and N-400 (for naturalization), ask applicants to disclose any previous visa violations or unauthorized work. Failure to disclose such activities is considered a serious issue under U.S. immigration law. Immigration lawyer Ira Kurzban highlights that the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has become increasingly stringent about ensuring applicants meet all eligibility criteria, particularly regarding employment violations.
Would Citizenship Revocation Be Likely?
If Musk’s case were to progress, it would likely require significant legal evidence, and he would have to face an inquiry by the Department of Justice, as USCIS typically refers such cases to federal prosecutors. Legal experts suggest that the passage of time and the nature of the alleged violation—working without authorization more than two decades ago—could weigh in Musk’s favor. However, they also note that the Trump administration set a precedent of actively pursuing cases of denaturalization, including forming a dedicated office to investigate citizenship fraud.
Greg Siskind, an immigration attorney, underscores that while Musk’s alleged actions technically fall under grounds for denaturalization, the practical enforcement of such cases is rare and often limited to instances of material misrepresentation that would have directly impacted the immigration outcome. In Musk’s case, Siskind speculates that, even if proven, the violations might not be significant enough to result in citizenship revocation.
The Larger Implications
Musk’s position as a government contractor and influential public figure adds a layer of public interest to the scrutiny surrounding his immigration past. As an immigrant himself, Musk’s stance on immigration policy and his substantial political influence make this case both symbolic and complex. The possibility of denaturalization is slim, but Musk’s experience is a reminder of how strict the U.S. can be on immigration compliance, even for high-profile individuals.
If Musk wishes to dispel these questions, experts suggest he could voluntarily disclose his immigration history through the Freedom of Information Act to clarify his status. This level of transparency might also quell any speculations about his early work status in the United States, offering a clearer picture of the entrepreneur’s rise within the American immigration system.
In the end, regardless of whether these allegations lead to any action, Musk’s case is a prominent example of how U.S. immigration laws apply to all individuals, regardless of their public status. As immigration issues continue to polarize public opinion, Musk’s journey serves as a focal point for discussions on both immigration law and its potential consequences for high-profile individuals.
Read more: