In a recent press conference, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha responded to Governor Dan McKee’s remarks labeling the years-long investigation into the ILO Group contract as a misuse of taxpayer funds, ultimately concluding with no criminal charges. Neronha emphasized the importance of transparency and public awareness regarding the investigation’s findings, stating, “The public has the right to know what happened.”
The investigation, which began following a Target 12 report in September 2021, scrutinized the circumstances surrounding a multimillion-dollar contract awarded to a newly formed consulting firm linked to political insiders. While the probe revealed that Governor McKee personally intervened to facilitate the contract, Neronha concluded that these actions did not rise to the level of criminal wrongdoing. He pointed out that failure to adhere to state procurement regulations, while serious, is not inherently a criminal offense.
In his analysis of over 1,000 pages of documents, including interviews, text messages, and emails, Neronha stated that the evidence, while suggestive of potential misconduct, was ultimately “cloudy and contradictory.” This includes a troubling email from ILO’s founder, which indicated manipulation of the competitive bidding process. However, the AG could not establish a direct connection between McKee’s actions and any alleged bribery or quid pro quo arrangements.
Critics of the investigation, including Rhode Island Republican Party Chairman Joe Powers, have accused Neronha of shielding a fellow Democrat. Powers stated, “Once again, we see Democrats protecting Democrats,” reflecting a growing discontent among some Rhode Islanders regarding the integrity of political processes.
On the other hand, advocates for government accountability, like John Marion of Common Cause Rhode Island, characterized the report as “damning,” asserting that state contracts must be awarded based on merit, not political connections. Marion called for a deeper examination of whether McKee violated other ethical standards, suggesting that the Attorney General’s legal analysis may not fully capture the gravity of the situation.
As the investigation’s findings continue to circulate, Neronha remains committed to ensuring that the public is informed about the actions and decisions of their leaders. “If there was a case here, we would have brought it,” he reiterated, emphasizing his office’s dedication to transparency and accountability.
Read more: