Following his electoral victory, President-elect Donald Trump stands poised to influence the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority once again. Trump, who previously shifted the court to a 6-3 conservative tilt, may have the opportunity to further entrench this ideology by appointing new, younger justices to replace senior conservative figures or fill vacancies should a liberal justice step down.
Legal experts anticipate that some of the longest-serving conservative justices—Clarence Thomas, 76, Samuel Alito, 74, and Chief Justice John Roberts, 70—may consider retirement, potentially opening the door for Trump to reinforce the court’s conservative legacy. This move could shape the direction of U.S. law for decades, especially if Trump replaces retiring justices with younger, ideologically aligned successors.
“I think it’s likely that one or both of Justices Thomas and Alito could step down in the next term,” remarked Gautam Hans, a law professor at Cornell University. He added, “There are multiple Trump-era appointees who would be natural candidates to fill their roles.”
With a solid conservative majority already in place, additional appointments could widen the ideological gap, potentially shifting the balance to a 7-2 conservative-dominated court if one of the three liberal justices steps down. The most senior liberal justice, Sonia Sotomayor, 70, has faced calls from some progressive circles to consider retirement while Democrats still hold influence. However, Sotomayor has yet to signal any intention to step down.
The Senate, now under Republican control, is expected to support Trump’s future judicial nominees. Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley expressed his eagerness to work with Trump in confirming “highly qualified, constitutionally sound judges.”
In his first term, Trump’s appointments redefined key areas of American law, from rolling back abortion rights to enhancing Second Amendment protections and limiting the scope of federal agencies. If given the chance to replace more justices, Trump could ensure the longevity of a conservative judicial philosophy grounded in “originalism,” the interpretation of the Constitution according to its original meaning—a guiding approach for justices like Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, who were all appointed by Trump.
The potential departure of Thomas, Alito, or Roberts may depend on each justice’s sense of their judicial legacy. Law experts believe that Thomas, in particular, might feel satisfied with his contributions to the court, while Alito and Roberts may see their work as unfinished, especially with a Trump administration ready to continue supporting their conservative values.
In contrast, Democrats face a challenging decision. With no realistic path to replace Justice Sotomayor before January, liberal advocates remain wary of repeating past missteps, such as the calls for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to retire during President Obama’s term—a decision that ultimately allowed Trump to replace her with Barrett, solidifying a conservative court.
Trump’s ability to leave an indelible mark on the Supreme Court reflects his commitment to a long-term conservative judicial vision, one that could endure through future administrations and continue shaping U.S. law.
Read more: