California voters have overwhelmingly passed Proposition 36, a new law that will reclassify certain misdemeanor theft and drug crimes as felonies, creating a new category called “treatment-mandated felonies.” This law aims to address rising concerns over retail theft and the state’s ongoing drug epidemic by requiring offenders to undergo mandatory drug treatment instead of serving time in prison.
The law has been touted as a way to reduce recidivism while offering those with substance abuse issues the opportunity for rehabilitation. Fresno County District Attorney Lisa Smittcamp explained, “After the third drug-related offense, individuals will face felony charges and be mandated to treatment, which will benefit the individual, their family, and the community.”
Proposition 36 is seen as a direct response to Proposition 47, passed in 2014, which reduced penalties for certain drug and theft crimes. Many believe that Prop 47 contributed to a rise in retail thefts and violent crime, as seen in incidents like the smash-and-grab robbery at DripOnDrip in North Fresno last year. Smittcamp stated, “Prop 36 targets habitual offenders, those who see theft as an easy and acceptable crime. After two prior offenses, they will face a felony charge.”
In Tulare County, District Attorney Tim Ward revealed a staggering 371% increase in petty theft offenders with three or more prior offenses since the passage of Proposition 47. Ward believes Prop 36 will send a clear message to repeat offenders: “We will hold them accountable.”
Proposition 36 also includes tougher penalties for individuals caught trafficking fentanyl, including longer prison sentences. Smittcamp noted, “The threat of jail time is often what motivates individuals to seek drug treatment and change their behavior.”
While supporters argue that the law is a necessary step to curb crime and promote rehabilitation, critics, such as UC Merced Political Science Professor Nate Monroe, warn that Prop 36 could lead to over-prosecution and overcrowding in prisons. Monroe noted, “This could result in increased economic pressure on the state as we see more individuals incarcerated for longer periods.”
Governor Gavin Newsom, who opposed Prop 36, voiced concerns about the law’s impact on drug policies and local funding for treatment programs. In a statement, Newsom said, “My concern with Proposition 36 is its regressive drug policy. Local officials will now be tasked with implementing this new mandate for drug treatment while facing cuts in funding for these programs.”
Despite opposition, Proposition 36 is set to take effect by December 18th, with local officials working to navigate its full impact. Smittcamp emphasized that while the law is not a comprehensive solution to California’s crime and drug problems, it represents a critical first step toward meaningful reform.
Read more: