On December 4, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a pivotal case that could shape the future of transgender healthcare for minors across the United States. At the heart of the case is Dr. Susan Lacy, a Memphis gynecologist who has treated transgender patients for years and now finds herself on the front lines of a legal battle challenging Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors.
In 2023, Tennessee passed a law prohibiting healthcare providers from prescribing puberty blockers or hormones to minors diagnosed with gender dysphoria. The law, which has sparked nationwide debate, aims to discourage transgender minors from undergoing medical treatments that some believe carry irreversible, lifelong consequences. Dr. Lacy, who has treated transgender individuals since 2016, believes the law is based on political rhetoric rather than medical facts.
“It’s difficult to understand why this is suddenly such a hot-button issue,” said Dr. Lacy, 57. “As a physician, I’ve seen firsthand the positive impact gender-affirming care has had on my patients. This law is not based on science or medical ethics; it’s fueled by political agendas.”
The case before the U.S. Supreme Court comes after the Biden administration appealed a lower court ruling that allowed Tennessee’s ban to take effect. Dr. Lacy is one of the plaintiffs in the case, which challenges the law’s constitutionality, arguing that it violates the 14th Amendment’s promise of equal protection under the law by discriminating against transgender minors.
Tennessee’s law has ignited fierce debates, with critics claiming that it harms vulnerable youth and denies them access to necessary medical care. Supporters, including Republican lawmakers like Majority Leader William Lamberth, contend that the law is crucial to protecting minors from making decisions they may later regret. “This case is about protecting young people from making irreversible, life-changing decisions that could have permanent consequences,” Lamberth said in a statement.
However, medical professionals like Dr. Lacy, as well as leading medical organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association, argue that gender-affirming care—when provided under clinical supervision—can dramatically improve the well-being of transgender minors. Studies have shown that access to puberty blockers and hormone therapy can reduce suicidal ideation, anxiety, and depression in transgender youth.
Dr. Lacy, who has treated hundreds of transgender patients, emphasized the emotional and psychological benefits of gender-affirming care. “The most common thing I hear from my patients is that they finally feel at peace with themselves,” Lacy said. “Their mental health improves, they begin to thrive, and they feel empowered to live their lives authentically.”
The case has broader implications for transgender rights, as it represents a major flashpoint in the culture wars surrounding gender identity and medical care. As the U.S. Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of Tennessee’s law, legal experts argue that the case could set a precedent for how transgender rights are treated in the future.
Tennessee’s justification for the law rests on claims of “scientific uncertainty” regarding the long-term effects of gender-affirming treatments. Critics, however, argue that the law fails to account for the extensive research supporting the efficacy and safety of such care. Additionally, the law restricts care for gender dysphoria while allowing minors to receive similar treatments for other conditions, such as precocious puberty, a point that the Justice Department has highlighted as discriminatory.
The legal team representing the plaintiffs, which includes the American Civil Liberties Union, argues that the law not only denies transgender minors access to care but also interferes with parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their children. The plaintiffs contend that the law’s selective nature, which discriminates based on gender identity, violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.
For Dr. Lacy, this legal challenge is more than just a professional obligation—it’s a personal one. As a mother of a transgender child, Lacy understands the importance of supporting young people through their gender transition. She has seen the challenges faced by transgender youth and their families, and she knows the critical role that healthcare professionals play in providing compassionate, competent care.
“Being a mother to a transgender child has given me a unique perspective on this issue,” Lacy explained. “I’ve seen the joy and peace that comes from receiving the right care, and I’ve also witnessed the harm that can come from the lack of it.”
As the legal battle continues, Dr. Lacy remains committed to advocating for transgender youth and their access to gender-affirming healthcare. She is hopeful that the U.S. Supreme Court will recognize the importance of protecting transgender rights and will rule in favor of the plaintiffs, ensuring that all young people—regardless of gender identity—have access to the medical care they need to live healthy, fulfilled lives.
The case scheduled to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court could have lasting consequences for transgender minors in Tennessee and beyond. A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs could set a precedent that challenges the growing wave of anti-transgender laws sweeping across the country. It would send a powerful message that discrimination against transgender individuals—especially transgender minors—has no place in American law.
Dr. Lacy and the other plaintiffs are hopeful that the Supreme Court will stand on the side of equality and justice, allowing transgender youth the right to make their own medical choices with the guidance of their parents and healthcare providers.
Read more: