In a groundbreaking legal action, a Pennsylvania resident has filed a lawsuit accusing several major food corporations of intentionally designing and marketing “ultra-processed” foods that are addictive to children, leading to chronic health issues. The lawsuit, filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, names well-known companies including Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Post Holdings, General Mills, Nestlé USA, Mars, Kellogg, and Conagra.
Bryce Martinez, a 23-year-old resident of Pennsylvania, claims that the consumption of these companies’ products from a young age led to his diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease when he was just 16. The lawsuit alleges that these companies intentionally engineered their products to be addictive, contributing to the rising prevalence of chronic diseases among children and adolescents.
This case, described as the first of its kind, is being led by the prominent law firm Morgan & Morgan, which represents Martinez. In the legal complaint, Martinez argues that food companies used tactics similar to those of the tobacco industry—specifically drawing from the “cigarette playbook” used by tobacco giants such as Philip Morris and R.J. Reynolds. These companies, he claims, manipulated the appeal of processed foods to maximize consumption by young, vulnerable audiences.
The lawsuit targets a range of ultra-processed foods, including popular snacks, sugary beverages, and sweets, which are often marketed directly to children. The food products in question are said to be made with substances extracted from whole foods or synthesized artificially, contributing to their addictive properties. Experts have linked such ultra-processed foods to an array of chronic health conditions, including obesity, heart disease, and diabetes.
Sarah Gallo, senior vice president of product policy for the Consumer Brands Association, an industry group representing food and beverage makers, pushed back on the lawsuit’s premise. She stated, “There is no universally agreed-upon definition of ultra-processed foods. Labeling food as unhealthy solely based on its level of processing or disregarding its full nutrient content can mislead consumers and exacerbate health disparities.”
Despite such pushback, evidence supporting the link between ultra-processed foods and chronic diseases has been mounting in recent years. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Robert Califf has acknowledged that these foods are likely addictive, while public health advocates, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., have criticized the food industry for its lack of regulation.
Martinez’s lawsuit brings attention to the growing concerns surrounding the food industry’s practices. The complaint includes claims for conspiracy, negligence, fraudulent misrepresentation, and unfair business practices. Martinez is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, though the exact amount remains unspecified.
The outcome of this high-profile case could have far-reaching implications, potentially setting a precedent for future legal actions against food companies accused of misleading consumers and contributing to public health crises.
Read more: