The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has filed criminal complaints against Apple and its subsidiaries in France and Belgium, accusing the tech giant of complicity in the trade of conflict minerals sourced from the war-torn region of Eastern Congo. The complaints, lodged this week, allege that Apple’s supply chain includes minerals linked to armed groups that fuel violence and human rights abuses in the region.
At the center of the accusations is the use of so-called 3T minerals—tin, tantalum, and tungsten—critical components in the production of smartphones, computers, and other electronic devices. These minerals are mined in areas controlled by armed groups, who profit from the exploitation of natural resources while perpetrating atrocities, including massacres, mass rape, and looting.
The DRC government argues that Apple, despite publicly stating its commitment to ethical sourcing, indirectly supports this criminal economy through its supply chain. The complaints accuse Apple subsidiaries Apple France, Apple Retail France, and Apple Retail Belgium of covering up war crimes, laundering minerals from conflict zones, and engaging in deceptive commercial practices that mislead consumers about the origins of the materials used in their products.
Apple vehemently disputes the allegations, maintaining that it has taken proactive steps to ensure its supply chains are free from conflict minerals. In a statement, the company reiterated that it does not directly source minerals from Congo and requires suppliers to audit and trace all minerals used in its products. Apple also emphasized that the majority of minerals in its products are recycled. Additionally, it cited its ongoing efforts to support organizations working to improve mineral traceability in the region.
Apple further clarified that in response to escalating violence in the DRC earlier this year, it notified its suppliers to suspend sourcing from Congo and Rwanda, citing concerns over the inability of independent auditors to conduct the necessary due diligence under current conditions.
The complaints filed in France and Belgium argue that Apple’s participation in traceability schemes like ITSCI (International Tin Supply Chain Initiative) is insufficient and misleading. Congo’s legal team claims that these systems, which Apple has used to certify its minerals as conflict-free, have been discredited for failing to provide reliable monitoring and accountability, particularly in regions plagued by violence such as North Kivu.
Congo’s lawyers argue that, despite Apple’s public statements, the company continues to rely on a flawed certification process that allows tainted minerals to enter the supply chain. The filing also includes references to reports from the U.S. State Department, which has expressed concerns about the role of illicit mineral trade in financing armed conflict in the region.
This move marks a significant escalation in the DRC’s legal efforts to hold multinational corporations accountable for their role in perpetuating the conflict through their sourcing practices. Lawyers for the DRC describe the complaints as a “first salvo” in what could become a broader legal battle against tech companies benefiting from the exploitation of Congo’s natural resources.
As the case progresses, French and Belgian judicial authorities will decide whether to investigate the complaints further and potentially bring criminal charges. This case also comes at a time when other global tech giants are facing increasing pressure to address human rights and environmental issues within their supply chains.
The outcome of these complaints could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, particularly as regulators around the world ramp up efforts to hold companies accountable for the sourcing of conflict minerals. It remains to be seen whether Apple’s efforts to improve its supply chain transparency will be enough to avoid legal consequences in this high-stakes case.
Read more: