Suffolk University Law Dean Andrew Perlman has explored the cutting-edge potential of artificial intelligence in his latest scholarly article, suggesting that generative AI will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of legal research and scholarship. Written with the help of ChatGPT, an advanced AI language model, Perlman’s article, titled “Generative AI and the Future of Legal Scholarship”, challenges conventional notions of legal research and outlines how AI could transform the way legal scholars approach their work.
In a world where technology continuously reshapes industries, Perlman argues that AI will significantly expand the horizons of legal scholarship by unveiling patterns in judicial reasoning, legislative behavior, and administrative actions that might otherwise remain hidden. Perlman’s research highlights how generative AI, including tools like ChatGPT, can rapidly generate new ideas, test hypothetical scenarios, and even suggest counterarguments, thus enhancing the speed and depth of legal analysis.
“AI doesn’t just mimic human intellect; it enhances the research process by offering new perspectives that were previously too time-consuming or complex to explore,” Perlman explains. “While human judgment remains critical in curating these ideas, AI’s ability to process vast amounts of information quickly opens the door to innovative ways of thinking about legal issues.”
The article, published on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), builds on previous studies that have examined the capabilities of AI in legal education. In 2023, a study revealed that GPT-4, the technology behind ChatGPT, could pass the bar exam with impressive results. Other research highlighted how AI tools helped law students perform better on certain assignments, although there were mixed results when it came to overall academic performance.
Despite these promising developments, Perlman’s article stresses that AI will not replace human scholars. Instead, it will serve as a powerful tool for those who are skilled at using it to advance legal knowledge. AI could help integrate diverse analytical methods, such as empirical legal studies and economic modeling, to produce a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of legal issues. However, as the article notes, the ethical oversight and scholarly judgment of human researchers will remain indispensable.
“The true potential of AI in legal scholarship lies not just in its ability to perform complex tasks, but in how it amplifies the creativity and rigor of human scholars,” Perlman writes in his conclusion. “The future of legal thought will belong to those who embrace this technology as a tool for advancing human understanding.”
Perlman’s article represents a significant moment in the ongoing conversation about the intersection of law and technology. As AI continues to evolve, it’s clear that its role in legal scholarship is only beginning to unfold—and the possibilities for innovation are limitless.
Read more: