Elon Musk‘s push to streamline the U.S. government has sparked legal and ethical concerns. Some experts and lawmakers question if his actions are crossing legal boundaries.
Musk, labeled a “special government employee” by the White House, works without pay and is limited to 130 days a year in his role. While he must follow some conflict-of-interest rules, legal experts are debating if he needs Senate confirmation for his expanding role in the government.
Musk leads the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a White House initiative aimed at cutting government bureaucracy. His team has canceled government contracts, terminated building leases, and even pushed to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. They’ve also gained access to Treasury Department systems and taken control of several key agencies like the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) and the General Services Administration (GSA).
Critics argue that Musk has no authority to shut down or alter agencies funded by Congress. Some say he has exceeded his mandate from an executive order, which only called for modernizing federal technology. His actions have sparked multiple lawsuits from public interest groups and government unions, and some legal experts believe he may be violating privacy laws.
Normally, federal agency heads, inspectors general, or the Department of Justice would prevent such actions. However, Trump has fired several inspectors general, and investigations are underway into interference with Musk’s work. Lawsuits could challenge his actions, and Congress, though Republican-controlled, could step in to limit his power.
Musk’s efficiency drive may be making waves, but the legal questions are far from settled.
Read more:
Federal Judge Halts Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order
Musk’s Lawsuit Against OpenAI Could Go To Trial, Judge Says
Elon Musk’s DOGE Commission Gains Access To Sensitive Treasury Data
