The legal battle over artificial intelligence and copyright is intensifying, but clear answers remain elusive. A recent court ruling in the United States sided with publishers, barring a legal research firm from using a rival’s content. However, this is just one case in a growing wave of lawsuits against AI companies for using copyrighted material to train their systems.
Generative AI systems rely on vast amounts of data to produce text, images, and videos. Many copyright holders argue that AI companies are using their content without permission. In Canada, a coalition of news publishers, including The Canadian Press, has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, claiming the company used news articles to train its ChatGPT system. The case, filed in Ontario last November, has not yet seen significant developments.
In the U.S., several media companies have launched copyright infringement lawsuits against AI firms. The New York Times is suing OpenAI and Microsoft, while the owner of the Wall Street Journal has taken legal action against Perplexity, an AI-powered search engine.
A recent court ruling in February determined that Ross Intelligence, a now-defunct legal research firm, violated copyright laws by using Thomson Reuters’ Westlaw content to build a competing platform. However, experts note that this is just one of many cases still in their early stages.
“There has been only one case of 20 or 30 that has reached a decision on copyright infringement and fair use,” said Jane Ginsburg, a professor at Columbia University specializing in intellectual property. “Most of the other cases are still in preliminary stages.”
Legal experts say U.S. decisions do not directly impact Canada but may serve as reference points.
“The American cases will be important but not necessarily determine Canada’s direction,” said Carys Craig, a law professor at York University.
The Canadian government is reviewing its copyright laws to address generative AI concerns. Creators and publishers want stronger protections, while AI companies argue that limiting access to content could slow innovation.
The federal government recently released a report summarizing its consultations. It stated that officials are still considering how to balance concerns from both cultural and technology industries.
Other countries are also struggling to find solutions. The U.K. government is considering allowing AI firms to use copyrighted material unless creators explicitly opt out. This proposal has faced backlash, with musicians like Elton John and Paul McCartney speaking out against it.
Craig believes Canada’s final policy decision will depend on political factors and how the U.S. and Europe handle similar issues.
“There’s still a lot that needs to be sorted out,” she said.
With a federal election potentially on the horizon, any major changes to Canadian copyright law will likely be delayed. In the meantime, media companies and AI firms may choose to negotiate licensing agreements instead of waiting for legal rulings.
Some publishers have already started licensing their content to AI companies. The Associated Press has signed agreements with OpenAI and Google’s Gemini, signaling a potential shift toward cooperation rather than conflict.
Ginsburg suggests that AI companies will eventually seek higher-quality training data, which could lead to more deals with publishers.
“The need for good-quality source data will likely bring copyright owners and AI firms to the negotiating table,” she said.
The battle over AI and copyright is far from over, and as lawsuits continue to unfold, the future of content ownership in the digital age remains uncertain.
Read more:
