A Guide to Understanding the Disadvantages of Arbitration

275

Arbitration is a popular alternative to traditional litigation for resolving disputes. It offers many benefits, such as faster resolution times, increased privacy, and more flexibility in choosing a neutral third party to adjudicate the dispute. However, like any legal process, there are also some significant drawbacks to arbitration that should be understood before deciding whether it is the best approach for your particular case. In this article, we will take a detailed look at some of the most common disadvantages of arbitration.

1. Limited Judicial Review

One significant disadvantage of arbitration is the limited ability to appeal or challenge an arbitrator’s decision. In most cases, the decision of the arbitrator is final and binding, with very few options for recourse if you disagree with the outcome. This lack of judicial review can be especially problematic if the arbitrator made an error in applying the law or if there was some other type of misconduct during the proceedings.

There are several reasons why limited judicial review can be a disadvantage of arbitration:

• Lack of transparency: Because arbitration proceedings are often conducted behind closed doors, it can be difficult to determine whether the arbitrator’s decision was fair and unbiased. Parties may feel like they are being denied access to information and evidence that could have been crucial to their case.
• Lack of precedent: Unlike court decisions, which establish binding precedents that must be followed, arbitral awards do not create legal precedent. This means that parties cannot rely on past decisions to guide future behavior, making it more difficult to predict outcomes and plan strategies.
• Risk of arbitration abuse: Some parties may use arbitration agreements as a way to limit the rights and remedies available to the other party. For example, a company might require its employees or customers to agree to mandatory arbitration as a condition of employment or service, effectively limiting their ability to sue or participate in class actions against the company.

2. Hidden Costs

Another potential drawback of arbitration is the potential for hidden costs. While arbitration is often touted as a cost-effective alternative to litigation, it can actually end up being more expensive than going to court in some cases. This is because arbitration fees can be significant and are typically split between the parties.

There are several reasons why hidden costs can be a disadvantage of arbitration:

• Arbitrator fees: Unlike judges who are paid by the government, arbitrators are private professionals who charge hourly rates for their services. Depending on the complexity of the case and the experience of the arbitrator, these fees can add up quickly and become a significant expense for both parties.
• Administrative fees: In addition to arbitrator fees, parties may also be required to pay administrative fees to organizations that oversee the arbitration process. These fees can vary widely depending on the organization and the type of case involved, but they can also be significant.
• Expert witness fees: If a party needs to hire an expert witness to help support their case, they will also need to pay for the expert’s time and expertise. This can be a significant expense, especially in complex cases that require multiple experts.

3. Limited Remedies

Another potential disadvantage of arbitration is the limited remedies available to the parties involved. While arbitration decisions are often final and binding, the types of relief that can be awarded are typically more limited than those available in court. For example, an arbitrator may not have the power to award punitive damages or issue injunctive relief, which could be critical in certain types of cases.

There are several reasons why limited remedies can be a disadvantage of arbitration:

• Lack of deterrent effect: Because arbitrators may not have the power to award punitive damages, there may be less of a deterrent effect on bad behavior. This can be especially problematic in cases where one party has significantly more bargaining power than the other.
• Limited compensation: If the arbitrator is unable to award all of the remedies that would be available in court, parties may be left without a clear path to obtaining full compensation for their losses. This can be particularly concerning in cases where the damages are significant or ongoing.
• Lack of injunctive relief: If an arbitrator is unable to issue injunctive relief, parties may be left without a way to prevent ongoing harm or enforce important legal rights. This can be especially problematic in cases where there is a risk of irreparable harm.

4. Limited Discovery

Another potential disadvantage of arbitration is the limited discovery available to the parties involved. Unlike in traditional litigation, where parties have the right to request and obtain a wide range of information through the discovery process, arbitration often limits the amount and type of information that can be requested. This can make it more difficult to build a strong case and may leave important facts uncovered.

There are several reasons why limited discovery can be a disadvantage of arbitration:

• Difficulty accessing evidence: Because discovery is limited, parties may not have access to all of the evidence they need to make their case. This can be especially problematic if the other party has control over important evidence or is unwilling to provide it voluntarily.
• Greater reliance on expert testimony: When discovery is limited, parties may need to rely more heavily on expert testimony to support their case. This can be expensive and time-consuming, as parties will need to find and hire qualified experts to testify on their behalf.

• Reduced ability to impeach witness credibility: In traditional litigation, parties have the right to cross-examine witnesses and challenge their credibility based on past behavior or statements. In arbitration, however, this ability may be limited, making it harder to challenge the reliability of witness testimony.

5. Limited Applicability of Precedent

Another potential disadvantage of arbitration is the limited applicability of precedent. Unlike court decisions, which establish binding precedents that must be followed, arbitral awards do not create legal precedent. This means that parties cannot rely on past decisions to guide future behavior, making it more difficult to predict outcomes and plan strategies.

There are several reasons why limited applicability of precedent can be a disadvantage of arbitration:

• Difficulty predicting outcomes: Because past arbitral awards do not establish binding precedent, parties may have a harder time predicting how an arbitrator will rule in their case. This can make it more difficult to plan strategies or assess the risks associated with pursuing arbitration.
• Lack of accountability: Without binding legal precedent, arbitrators may feel less accountable for their decisions and may be more likely to deviate from established legal principles. This can lead to inconsistent decisions and make it harder for parties to gauge the strength of their case.
• Potential for biased decision-making: Without legal precedent to guide their decisions, arbitrators may be more likely to rely on personal bias or subjective opinions when making their rulings. This can be especially problematic if the arbitrator has a personal or professional relationship with one of the parties involved.

In conclusion, while arbitration can be a useful tool for resolving disputes outside of the courtroom, it is not without its drawbacks. Limited judicial review, hidden costs, limited remedies, limited discovery, and limited applicability of precedent are just a few of the potential disadvantages that should be carefully considered before deciding whether to pursue arbitration. Ultimately, the decision to use arbitration or traditional litigation will depend on the specific circumstances of each case, and parties should seek the advice of qualified legal counsel before making a final choice.